Skip to main content

Motor Insurance: Comprehensive insurance covers car occupants and pillion riders

INSURANCE companies have been capitalising on the misperception that a comprehensive motor insurance policy (CIP) does not cover persons travelling in a car or sitting astride the pillion of two-wheelers. Most consumers believe the policy only covers loss or damage to the vehicle and third party accident claims.

When vehicle owners want passengers to be insured, the insurer charges an additional premium, although they get covered, by default, under a CIP. There have been instances when the vehicle owner has been personally held liable to pay compensation to the injured passengers. This because the insurer misled the courts about the scope of a CIP.

This deceit got exposed when the Delhi High Court looked into a judgement passed by Justice JR Midha in the case of Yashpal Luthra & Anr versus United India Insurance Co Ltd & Anr.

Vinod Luthra, 24, was sitting astride the pillion of a motorcycle being driven by his friend, Umed Singh Mateyee. Their bike got hit by an unknown vehicle. Luthra fell down, suffered fatal injuries and died. The bike was covered under a CIP issued by United India Insurance. Luthras parents and widow filed aclaim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) against the insurer and the vehicle owner.

The insurer defended by contending that a pillion rider could not be termed as third party. Hence, the CIP did not cover the pillion rider. Accepting this, the MACT exonerated the insurer, but held the vehicle owner solely liable to pay the claim, pegged at `453,300. The Luthras appealed to the Delhi high court against this order, urging the insurer also be liable. They also pleaded for increasing the amount awarded by the MACT.

The high court framed the case thus: Whether, under a CIP, the insurer is liable to compensate for the death or injury of a pillion rider or the occupants in acar? This was to be considered in the light of the policy terms and conditions, which provide that, subject to the limits specified, the insurer would indemnify the insured in respect of death of, or bodily injury to, any person, including the passengers. In case the occupants are being carried for hire, the insurer would not be liable. Similarly, if the passenger is an employee (or driver), the insurer would also not be liable.

To determine this issue in accordance with the directives of the Tariff Advisory Committee (TAC) and that of the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (Irda), the high court considered it necessary to examine officers from the insurance company, TAC and Irda.

The court also examined M A Kharat, general manager of United India Insurance, who admitted the company was liable. Kharat further stated that on 16.11.2009, Irda had issued a circular to all insurers, reiterating that under CIP, they were liable in respect of a pillion rider and the occupants in a car. Kharat admitted to another wrong stand taken by the insurer before the Supreme Court in another matter. He said he would instruct the companys advocate to clarify to the court the correct legal position, thus admitting the liability of the insurer.

The Irda informed the court it had convened a meeting of all public and private insurers, where this issue was discussed, and a consensus reached that insurers were liable for claims of occupants of vehicles and pillion riders under a CIP. So, it was decided, in cases where a contrary plea had been taken, the lawyers and the operating officers would be informed within seven days to correct their stand.

Justice Midha also expressed hope that a large number of pending cases all over the country would come to an end, and the claimants who have been denied compensation shall get their legitimate due.

The impact can be best summed up in the courts observation that a non-issue had been turned into an issue.

Popular posts from this blog

Am you Required to E-file Tax Return?

Download Tax Saving Mutual Fund Application Forms Invest In Tax Saving Mutual Funds Online Buy Gold Mutual Funds Leave a missed Call on 94 8300 8300   Am I Required to 'E-file' My Return? Yes, under the law you are required to e-file your return if your income for the year is Rs. 500,000 or more. Even if you are not required to e-file your return, it is advisable to do so for the following benefits: i) E-filing is environment friendly. ii) E-filing ensures certain validations before the return is filed. Therefore, e-returns are more accurate than the paper returns. iii) E-returns are processed faster than the paper returns. iv) E-filing can be done from the comfort of home/office and you do not have to stand in queue to e-file. v) E-returns can be accessed anytime from the tax department's e-filing portal. For further information contact Prajna Capit...
Read more

Mutual Fund Review: HDFC Index Sensex Plus

  In terms of size, HDFC Index Sensex Plus may be one of the smallest offerings from the HDFC stable. But that has not dampened its show, which has beaten the Sensex by a mile in overall returns   HDFC Index Sensex Plus is a passively managed diversified equity scheme with Sensex as its benchmark index. The fund also invests a small proportion of its equity portfolio in non-Sensex scrips. The scheme cannot boast of an impressive size and is one of the smallest in the HDFC basket with assets under management (AUM) of less than 60 crore. PERFORMANCE: Being passively managed and portfolio aligned to that of the benchmark, the performance of the index fund is expected to follow that of the benchmark and in this respect, it has not disappointed investors. Since its launch in July 2002, the fund has outperformed Sensex in overall returns by good margins.    While every 1,000 invested in HDFC Index Sensex Plus in July 2002 is worth 6,130 now, a similar amount invested in Sensex then wo...
Read more

IDFC - Long term infrastructure bonds - Tranche 2

IDFC - Long term infrastructure bonds What are infrastructure bonds? In 2010, the government introduced a new section 80CCF under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (" Income Tax Act ") to provide for income tax deductions for subscription to long-term infrastructure bonds and pursuant to that the Central Board of Direct Taxes passed Notification No. 48/2010/F.No.149/84/2010-SO(TPL) dated July 9, 2010. These long term infrastructure bonds offer an additional window of tax deduction of investments up to Rs. 20,000 for the financial year 2010-11. This deduction is over and above the Rs 1 lakh deduction available under sections 80C, 80CCC and 80CCD read with section 80CCE of the Income Tax Act. Infrastructure bonds help in intermediating the retail investor's savings into infrastructure sector directly. Long term infrastructure Bonds by IDFC IDFC issued an earlier tranche of these long term infrastructure bonds on November 12, 2010. This is the second public issue of long-te...
Read more

Section 80CCD

Top SIP Funds Online   Income tax deduction under section 80CCD Under Income Tax, TaxPayers have the benefit of claiming several deductions. Out of the deduction avenues, Section 80CCD provides t axpayer deductions against investments made in specific sector s. Under Section 80CCD, an assessee is eligible to claim deductions against the contributions made to the National Pension Scheme or Atal Pension Yojana. Contributions made by an employer to National Pension Scheme are also eligible for deductions under the provisions of Section 80 CCD. In this article, we will take a look at the primary features of this section, the terms and conditions for claiming deductions, the eligibility to claim such deductions, and some of the commonly asked questions in this regard. There are two parts of Section 80CCD. Subsection 1 of this section refers to tax deductions for all assesses who are central government or state government employees, or self-employed or employed by any other employers. In...
Read more

ULIP Review: ProGrowth Super II

  If you are interested in a death cover that's just big enough, HDFC SL ProGrowth Super II is something worth a try. The beauty is it has something for everybody — you name the risk profile, the category is right up there. But do a SWOT analysis of the basket, and the gloss fades     HDFC SL ProGrowth Super II is a type-II unit-linked insurance plan ( ULIP ). Launched in September 2010, this is a small ticket-size scheme with multiple rider options and adequate death cover. It offers five investment options (funds) — one in each category of large-cap equity, mid-cap equity, balanced, debt and money market fund. COST STRUCTURE: ProGrowth Super II is reasonably priced, with the premium allocation charge lower than most others in the category. However, the scheme's mortality charge is almost 60% that of LIC mortality table for those investing early in life. This charge reduces with age. BENEFITS: Investors can choose a sum assured between 10-40 times the annualised premium...
Read more
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Invest in Tax Saving Mutual Funds Download Any Applications
Transact Mutual Funds Online Invest Online
Buy Gold Mutual Funds Invest Now