Skip to main content

Government is recapitalising banks in India How to cash in

THE GOVERNMENT has announced the recapitalisation of public sector banks in the interim budget to infuse more capital into banks so that they can increase their lending and improve their liquidity. As per the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) norms, banks are expected to maintain a capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 9% or higher. All Indian banks have higher CAR than the prescribed limit. However, it seems that the government intends all PSU banks to have a CAR of at least 12% (see table showing the list of PSU banks with CAR of 12% or less). This is what makes recapitalisation different in India from what is happening globally, especially in the US and Europe, where governments have to step in to save the possible bankruptcy due to erosion of capital. Indeed, the move will make PSU banks much stronger than earlier to face any eventuality.

However, what is good for banks may not be that good for their shareholders. This is because, when the government infuses more capital into banks, its percentage ownership increases at the cost of other shareholders. But, the story does not end here. It can very well be the case that post capital infusion, the profits grow to such an extent that despite of lesser percentage ownership, the shareholders are left with more money in their hands.

lets find out the impact of earlier recapitalisation on the performance of the banks. Logically, after the recapitalisation, banks should clean up their books and scale up the growth trajectory. We analysed the trend in profit growth during the financial years, after the increase in the paid-up equity capital. Apart from profit growth, we also tried to analyse the trend in interest income to find whether the bank could scale up lending with more capital in hand. In certain cases, banks did not do well after capital infusion. For example, for Bank of Maharashtra (BoM), the paid-up capital was up by Rs 100 crore in FY04. However, the interest earned grew by 7.7% and 4.5% in FY05 and FY06, respectively. The bank’s growth in interest-earned was not helped by the capital infusion. It shows that BoM could not lend more, as normally expected, with more capital. BoM’s profit declined post recapitalisation by 41.8% and 71.3% in FY05 and FY06, respectively. In the case of many other banks, though the interest income grew at higher rates post recapitalisation, the profit growth fell apart. UCO Bank’s interest income grew at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22.4% during the period between FY05 and FY08 post the capital infusion in FY04. However, UCO Bank’s profits fell at a CAGR of 2.4% in FY05-08. This shows that high growth in lending may not necessarily translate into high bottom line growth. Similar was the case with IndusInd Bank and Andhra Bank.

Notwithstanding the dismal performance of a few banks post capital infusion, there were many big PSU banks, which did well after the recapitalisation. For instance, Bank of Baroda’s (BoB) paid up equity capital was increased by Rs 71 crore in FY06, and after that its interest earned grew by 27.7% and 31.2% in FY07 and FY08, respectively. Before FY06, the bank’s interest income was expanding at lower rates. BoB’s profit grew by 23.1% and 40.9% in FY07 and FY08, respectively. In this case, the recapitalisation was indeed helpful in revitalising the bank. Quite similar was the case with Allahabad Bank, Union Bank of India and Syndicate Bank among others.

In a nutshell, more banks have raised the growth trajectory after the recapitlisation. The key for shareholders is that the more stable the bank is, the more likely that it will actually grow at higher rates post infusion of capital. Hence, for investment purposes, recapitalisation will be more rewarding in the case of stable banks such as State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB), Bank of India (BoI), Union Bank of India, Bank of Baroda (BoB), Corporation Bank and Syndicate Bank.

Popular posts from this blog

Tata Mutual Fund

Being a part of the Tata group, the fund has the backing of a very trusted brand name with strong retail connect. While the current CEO has done an excellent job in leveraging the Tata brand name to AMC's advantage, it is ironic that this was just not capitalised on at the start. Incorporated in 1995, Tata Mutual Fund remained an 'also-ran' fund house for around eight years. Till March 2003, it had a little over Rs 1,000 crore in assets and 19 AMCs were ahead of it. But soon after that the equation changed. It was the fastest growing fund house in 2004 and 2005. During these two years, it aggressively launched six equity funds, two debt funds and one MIP. The fund house as of now stands at No. 8 in terms of asset size. This fund house has a lot to offer by way of choice. And, it also has a number of well performing schemes. Tata Pure Equity, Tata Equity PE and Tata Infrastructure are all good funds. It also has quite a few good debt funds. The funds of Tata AMC are known to...

UTI Mutual Fund

Even though only a few of UTI’s funds are great performers, this public sector fund house has many advantages that its rivals do not. It has a huge base of retail equity investors and a vast distribution network. As a business, it looks stronger than ever, especially in the aftermath of credit crunch. UTI is, by a large margin, the most profitable fund company in the country. This is not surprising, since managing equity funds is more profitable than debt. Its conservative approach and stable parentage is likely to make it look more attractive to investors in times to come. UTI’s big problem is the dragging performance that many of its equity funds suffer from. In recent times, the management has made a concerted effort to improve performance. However, these moves have coincided with a disastrous phase in the stock markets and that has made it impossible to judge whether the overhaul will eventually be a success. UTI’s top performers are a few index funds, some hybrid funds and its inf...

Salary planning Article

1. The salary (basic + DA) should be low. The rest should come by way of such allowances on which the employer pays FBT and you don't pay any tax thereon. 2. Interest paid on housing loan is deductible u/s 24 up to Rs 1.5 lakh (Rs 150,000) on self-occupied property and without any limit on a commercial or rented house. 3. The repayment of housing loan from specified sources is also deductible irrespective of whether the house is self-occupied or given on rent within the overall ceiling of Rs 1 lakh of Sec. 80C. 4. Where the accommodation provided to the employee is taken on lease by the employer, the perk value is the actual amount of lease rental or 20 per cent of the salary, whichever is lower. Understandably, if the house belongs to a family member who is at a low or nil tax zone the family benefits. Yes, the maximum benefit accrues when the rent is over 20 per cent of the salary. 5. A chauffeur driven motor car provided by the employer has no perk value. True, the company would...

8 Investing Strategy

The stock market ‘meltdown’ witnessed since the start of 2005 (notwithstanding the recent marginal recovery) has once again brought to the forefront an inherent weakness existent in our markets. This is the fact that FIIs, indisputably and almost entirely, dominate the Indian stock market sentiments and consequently the market movements. In this article, we make an attempt to list down a few points that would aid an investor in mitigating the risks and curtailing the losses during times of volatility as large investors (read FIIs) enter and exit stocks. Read on Manage greed/fear: This is an important point, which every investor must keep in mind owing to its great influencing ability in equity investment decisions. This point simply means that in a bull run - control the greed factor, which could entice you, the investor, to compromise with your investment principles. By this we mean that while an investor could get lured into investing in penny and small-cap stocks owing to their eye-...

Debt Funds - Check The Expiry Date

This time we give you an insight into something that most debt fund investors would be unaware of, the Average Portfolio Maturity. As we all know, debt funds invest in bonds and securities. These instruments mature over a certain period of time, which is called maturity. The maturity is the length of time till the principal amount is returned to the security-holder or bond-holder. A debt fund invests in a number of such instruments and each of these instruments would be having different maturity times. Hence, the fund calculates a weighted average maturity, which would give a fair idea of the fund's maturity period. For example, if a fund owns three bonds of 2-year (Rs 30,000), 3-year (Rs 10,000) and 5-year (Rs 20,000) maturities, its weighted average maturity would be 3.17 years. What is the big deal about average maturity then, you may ask. Well, knowing a fund's average maturity is important because it tells you how sensitive a fund is to the change in interest rates. It is ...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Invest in Tax Saving Mutual Funds Download Any Applications
Transact Mutual Funds Online Invest Online
Buy Gold Mutual Funds Invest Now