Skip to main content

Do not chase Last year Best Fund

    Top SIP Funds Online 


Don't chase the fund that won last year

Returns are just one aspect. Many objective and subjective factors go into picking funds, including consistency of performance and the fund management team


You invest to earn returns. However, returns are a function of many things. Different banks don't offer the same rate for fixed deposits of similar tenure. Come to market-linked investments like mutual funds, and the differences get magnified. The past 1-year returns for funds in the large-cap equity category ranged from 12% to 36%. If you were invested in a fund that delivered the worst, your portfolio return would look relatively poor. Thus, should you always try to pick the top performer? Even in case of fixed deposits, it's rare that investors pick the one that offers the highest return or even compare the returns. Rather, it is more about convenience of having investment products with the bank one has a savings account in. In case of market-linked investments, rankings based only on returns can change at short intervals, and moving in and out of funds based only on performance can be costly and counterproductive.

If not returns, then how does one choose? 

Performance change  

We looked at equity funds in multi-cap and large-cap diversified categories and compared 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year returns on five random days between now and 1 January 2014. Why random dates? Investment decisions are taken on random dates; you can decide to start investing at any point in time and when you want to pick an equity fund, intuitively, the first action is to compare returns.

We found that if you look at the past 1-year performance of funds in the equity multi-cap category in February 2017 and match the top ten schemes in terms of returns in, say, October 2015, it's unlikely there will be any overlap. Similarly, the top ten basket in August 2016 and January 2014 looked completely different from today's basket. Repeat this exercise for 3-year returns, and the chances of finding the same names as the top ten performers are only about 10%.


This trend holds true even if you consider the large-cap diversified category and for longer 5- to 10-year performances. One has to make concessions for new fund launches and fund mergers. But what it means is, if you invest only based on performance, you will end up chasing too many funds. 


What you will have for sure is a fund that delivered good returns in the past but with very little focus on its potential. Moreover, every time you invest based on past returns, if there is any slack in performance, you are likely to sell too soon. Performance data by itself only gives you a point to point reference. There are several objective and subjective criteria to pick funds, including consistency of performance and fund management team. The stocks bought are not as important as the knowledge, freedom, security and confidence that a fund manager has. Equity funds from four funds houses and believes that selection can't be automated. Each fund manager is different and investors must assess that. 

How to choose

In addition to past performance, looking at the consistency of performance and risk measures like fund beta and Sharpe ratio can give an indication of what to expect. A fund that hasn't displayed consistent performance in the past is considered high risk. A fund portfolio with a beta greater than 1 indicates sharper movement relative to the market. Fund performance up to the first year shouldn't be looked at. If there is a drag, consider calendar year performance for, say, the past 5 years. If only 1 year is bad, you know you have to give it time.

Secondly, while performance and risk numbers will change depending on when you are looking, the fund manager's ability and focus around the fund ideally shouldn't waver.

All funds rarely perform equally well at all times, so diversifying into a few funds, which are complimentary in style and portfolio, helps to balance near-term performance gaps. It is important to remain invested through market cycles rather than just looking at recent returns

A fund manager's stock selection style, the investment process and ability to move from one company to another will eventually result in the returns that a scheme earns.

Each fund manager is different. It's important to assess the freedom and security a manager has to make stock selection choices. Their conviction and integrity is also criticality. But these are subjective factors and an average investor may not be able to evaluate them easily. 

For investors, the focus in equity mutual funds should be to build a diversified portfolio, which can be held for at least 7-10 years.

Market dynamics change but fund managers often select stocks based on their earnings conviction for a particular company, which takes time to play out. 

An adviser can help you pick funds for the long term and hand hold you through short-term lapses in performance. During portfolio reviews, I spend around 20% of the time on individual scheme performance as the discussion needs to be around financial objectives. Performance tracking is something that should be left to the adviser. We consider many aspects and have interactions with fund managers before suggesting a buy or sell.

Fund selection can't be based solely on performance. A fund at the bottom today can well be a top performer 6-12 months later. 

While some objective criteria should be looked at for fund selection, as it establishes a performance track record, a lot of the selection is subjective.

Advisers we spoke to said that interactions with fund managers are important in deciding whether to invest in the funds they manage. For the average investor, who doesn't have the time or the ability to evaluate the softer aspects of individual funds, it's best to take the help of an experienced adviser. The other alternative is to invest in passive funds where risk of fund manager selection does not exist. Here you will earn market returns, as passive funds track the performance of underlying indices. 



Invest Rs 1,50,000 and Save Tax up to Rs 46,350 under Section 80C. Get Great Returns by Investing in Best Tax Saver ELSS Funds. Save Tax Get Rich

For further information contact SaveTaxGetRich on 94 8300 8300

OR

You can write to us at

Invest [at] SaveTaxGetRich [dot] Com

OR

Call us on 94 8300 8300

Popular posts from this blog

Birla SunLife Manufacturing Equity Fund

The Make in India program was launched by Prime Minister Naredra Modi in September 2014 as part of a wider set of nation-building initiatives. It was devised to transform India into a global design and manufacturing hub. The primary motive of the campaign is to encourage multinational as well domestic companies to manufacture their products in India. This would create more job opportunities, bring high-quality standards and attract capital along with technological investment to bring more foreign direct investment (FDI) in the country.   Why India as the next manufacturing destination?   The rising demand in India along with the multinational's desire to diversify their production to include low-cost plants in countries other than China, can help India's manufacturing sector to grow and create millions of jobs. In the words of our Honourable Prime Minister- Mr. Narendra Modi, India offers the 3 'Ds' for business to thrive— democracy,...

Total Returns Index brings out real Equity Funds Performers

From February, equity mutual funds have to change their benchmarks to account for dividend payments. Until now, funds used price-based benchmarks alone. TRI or total return indices assume that dividend payouts are reinvested back into the index. What this does is lift the overall index returns, because dividends get compounded. For example, the Sensex TRI index will consider dividend payouts of its constituent companies while the Nifty50 TRI index will consider dividends of its constituents. Using TRI indices as benchmarks comes on the argument that an equity funds earn dividends on the stocks in its portfolio, which they use to buy more stocks. Therefore, using an index that also considers dividend reinvestment would be a more appropriate benchmark. Shrinking outperformance With a stiffer benchmark, it is obvious that the margin by which an equity fund outperforms the benchmark would shrink. Rolling one-year returns from 2013 onwards, the average margin by which largecap funds out...

Kisan Vikas Patra - KVP

  Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) First launched in 1988, the Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) is one of the premier and popular saving scheme offering from the Indian Postal Department. This product has had a very chequered history- initially successful, deemed a product that could be misused and thus terminated in 2011, followed by a triumphant return to prominence and popular consumption in 2014. The salient features of KVP are as follows- The grand USP- Money invested by the applicant doubles in 100 months (8 years, 4 months). KVPs are available in the following denominations- Rs.1000, Rs.5000, Rs.10,000 and Rs.50,000. The minimum purchase value for the KVP is Rs.1000. There is no maximum limit. KVPs are available at all departmental post offices across India. These certificates can be prematurely encashed after 2 ½ years from the point of issue. KVPs can be transferred from one individual to another and from one post office to another. ----------------------------------------------------- Inve...

Mutual Fund Review: Reliance Regular Savings Equity

    Despite high churn, Reliance Regular Savings Equity has managed to fetch good returns   In its short history, this one has made its mark. Though its annual and trailing returns are amazing, the fund started off on a lousy note (last two quarters of 2005). It managed to impress in 2006 and was turning out to be pretty average in 2007, till Omprakash Kuckian took over in November 2007 and wasted no time in changing the complexion of the portfolio. Exposure to Construction shot up to 28 per cent with almost 21 per cent cornered by Pratibha Industries and Madhucon Projects . Exposure to Engineering was yanked up (18.50%) while Financial Services lost its prime slot (dropped to 6.69%) and Auto was dumped. That quarter (December 2007), he delivered 54.66 per cent (category average: 25.70%).   When the market collapsed in 2008, thankfully the fund did not plummet abysmally. But even its high cash allocations could not cushion the fall which hovered around the category average. ...

Stock Review: Havells

HAVELLS India's stock performance has been muted in the past three months, in line with the weak broader market. But, given the turnaround in its overseas subsidiary and the launch of new products in its consumer durable business, the company's stock may undergo a re-rating.    Havells is India's leading consumer electrical goods company, with consolidated sales of . 5,527 crore in the past four quarters. Its wholly-owned subsidiary Sylvania, which makes lighting and fixtures, has established brands in European, Latin American and Asian markets. Sylvania repre sented nearly half of the company's consolidated revenues in the first half of FY11.    Sylvania's poor financials hit Havells' consolidated performance in FY10. But, this has changed in the cur rent fiscal. Havells has reduced fixed costs of Sylvania by exiting from unprofitable businesses and outsourcing manufacturing to low-cost locations such as India and China. In the September 2010 quarter, Sylv...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Invest in Tax Saving Mutual Funds Download Any Applications
Transact Mutual Funds Online Invest Online
Buy Gold Mutual Funds Invest Now