Skip to main content

Motor Insurance: Comprehensive insurance covers car occupants and pillion riders

INSURANCE companies have been capitalising on the misperception that a comprehensive motor insurance policy (CIP) does not cover persons travelling in a car or sitting astride the pillion of two-wheelers. Most consumers believe the policy only covers loss or damage to the vehicle and third party accident claims.

When vehicle owners want passengers to be insured, the insurer charges an additional premium, although they get covered, by default, under a CIP. There have been instances when the vehicle owner has been personally held liable to pay compensation to the injured passengers. This because the insurer misled the courts about the scope of a CIP.

This deceit got exposed when the Delhi High Court looked into a judgement passed by Justice JR Midha in the case of Yashpal Luthra & Anr versus United India Insurance Co Ltd & Anr.

Vinod Luthra, 24, was sitting astride the pillion of a motorcycle being driven by his friend, Umed Singh Mateyee. Their bike got hit by an unknown vehicle. Luthra fell down, suffered fatal injuries and died. The bike was covered under a CIP issued by United India Insurance. Luthras parents and widow filed aclaim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) against the insurer and the vehicle owner.

The insurer defended by contending that a pillion rider could not be termed as third party. Hence, the CIP did not cover the pillion rider. Accepting this, the MACT exonerated the insurer, but held the vehicle owner solely liable to pay the claim, pegged at `453,300. The Luthras appealed to the Delhi high court against this order, urging the insurer also be liable. They also pleaded for increasing the amount awarded by the MACT.

The high court framed the case thus: Whether, under a CIP, the insurer is liable to compensate for the death or injury of a pillion rider or the occupants in acar? This was to be considered in the light of the policy terms and conditions, which provide that, subject to the limits specified, the insurer would indemnify the insured in respect of death of, or bodily injury to, any person, including the passengers. In case the occupants are being carried for hire, the insurer would not be liable. Similarly, if the passenger is an employee (or driver), the insurer would also not be liable.

To determine this issue in accordance with the directives of the Tariff Advisory Committee (TAC) and that of the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (Irda), the high court considered it necessary to examine officers from the insurance company, TAC and Irda.

The court also examined M A Kharat, general manager of United India Insurance, who admitted the company was liable. Kharat further stated that on 16.11.2009, Irda had issued a circular to all insurers, reiterating that under CIP, they were liable in respect of a pillion rider and the occupants in a car. Kharat admitted to another wrong stand taken by the insurer before the Supreme Court in another matter. He said he would instruct the companys advocate to clarify to the court the correct legal position, thus admitting the liability of the insurer.

The Irda informed the court it had convened a meeting of all public and private insurers, where this issue was discussed, and a consensus reached that insurers were liable for claims of occupants of vehicles and pillion riders under a CIP. So, it was decided, in cases where a contrary plea had been taken, the lawyers and the operating officers would be informed within seven days to correct their stand.

Justice Midha also expressed hope that a large number of pending cases all over the country would come to an end, and the claimants who have been denied compensation shall get their legitimate due.

The impact can be best summed up in the courts observation that a non-issue had been turned into an issue.

Popular posts from this blog

Group Health Insurance

Buy Group Health Insurance Online   For Human Resources, the biggest challenge today is to decide whether medical benefits should be offered to employees or not, what type of plans should be offered, what will be the cost and how will the cost be split between employees and employer. Well, most of these are subjective and would depend on a lot of factors including company size, average employee salary, etc. However, this article will give you a fair idea on how you should go about deciding these factors: 1. Why offer group health insurance benefit to employees : Studies have proved that retention rates among employers offering GHI are much higher than the ones who are not offering. Moreover, the cost of providing this benefit as a percentage of salary is very low as compared to the perceived value. As an example, say if average salary of an employee in your organization is 4 LPA. If you decide to offer a health insurance benefit to him for a Sum insured of ...
Read more

ICICI Prudential Dynamic Plan Invest Online

Download Tax Saving Mutual Fund Application Forms Invest In Tax Saving Mutual Funds Online Buy Gold Mutual Funds Leave a missed Call on 94 8300 8300   ICICI Prudential Dynamic Plan             Invest Online This fund does remarkably well during falling markets, but fails to show the same prowess during a rising market. The fund sticks to its mandate to adapt to the dynamic nature of the market by shuttling between debt and equity. It takes aggressive asset calls in equity when the market surges by investing in quality mid-cap stocks. At the same time, it adopts a defensive strategy by investing in debt and cash when markets get overvalued, making it a good long-term choice.     For further information contact Prajna Capital on 94 8300 8300 by leaving a missed call     Leave a missed Call on 94 8300 8300   Leave your comment with mail ID and we will ...
Read more

Birla Sun Life MIP II Savings 5

  Birla Sun Life MIP II Savings 5 - Invest Online   Have you traditionally been a debt investor but now wish to test waters in equities? Then, debt-oriented funds such as Birla Sun Life MIP II Savings 5 (Birla Savings 5), which have limited exposure to equities, may fit your requirement. With a five year return of 10.5 per cent compounded annually, the fund managed a good 3-3.5 percentage points more than its benchmark Crisil MIP Blended Index, as well as its category average. The fund appears well poised to capitalise on a falling interest rate scenario and has increased the average portfolio duration of its debt instruments in recent times. Suitability Birla Savings 5 is suitable only for conservative investors. If you want to make a beginning in equities and cannot take any short-term declines in your stride, then this fund will suit you. If you are already an equity investor and want to use a debt-oriented fund merely as a diversifier, then you may prefer peers from the HDFC and Re...
Read more

Lump Sum or SIP?

Invest Mutual Fund Online     You have a lump sum in hand and you wish to invest in equity funds. However, you have heard a lot of talk about investing in equity funds through Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs) because they help average costs, ensure you do not ill-time the market, and help you invest in small sums, besides giving you many other advantages. So, should you invest the money you have in hand in one go, or let it remain in your bank account and then do an SIP? There is no harm in investing a lump sum amount. For all you know, compounding, over the long term, could work better with lump sum. However, make sure you fulfill all of these three criteria if you want to invest in one go. Else, SIP is the way to go. #1: You invest for the long term According to past data, ideally, if you have a time frame of 12 years or more, you can consider lump sum investing (provided you satisfy the other two conditions that follow). So, what is the sanctity behind 12 years? Is it because only...
Read more

Mutual Fund Review: Reliance Regular Savings Balanced

Reliance Regular Savings Balanced fund has shown great resilience during market crash After a shaky start, this fund has established itself as a strong contender in this space. In the past three years it has ridden the market well by not only delivering during the market run-ups but also displaying resilience during the crash. In 2008, it witnessed the second lowest fall among its category and last year it was amongst the top three performers with a return of 76 per cent (category average: 61%).   The poor underperformance in 2006 can well be credited to the low equity allocation of the fund, which stood at just over 10 per cent for only four months that year. Though the fund has the leeway to go up to 75 per cent in equity, it has never touched that limit. In fact, it has exceeded 70 per cent in just five months in its entire history. During the crash of 2008, the fund managers had no problem going right down to 54 per cent (equity exposure). Fund managers Omprakash Kukian and A...
Read more
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Invest in Tax Saving Mutual Funds Download Any Applications
Transact Mutual Funds Online Invest Online
Buy Gold Mutual Funds Invest Now